7 Biology Myths an Electrical Engineer Would Never Tolerate

[McHenry186]

Originally Posted by GordZilla

hey I was quoting my buddy, this was one of his counters. I think it's fairly weak point myself, but if it were a court of law we were in it might hold water. We're not talking about something here that is completely tangable here. We are talking about genetic code, and in science you can't just say something is true because you know of no instance where it doesn't seem to be true. In science it has to be demonstratable, so in that sense you can't prove something is by using examples of what it is not. We figured out the earth was round not by proving it's not square or triangular but by demonstrating certain properties, that the earth has, that belong only to spherical objects. You can't prove a positive by using negatives in science, you need to be able to demonstrate your findings. If you say 'all codes are from inteligent design' then you need to demonstrate that. I don't think this can be done, however I'm still with you (and him) on the conclusion that it sure SEEMS to be the case. But whatever, this was his point afterall not mine, just playing devil's advocate here.

"And what else do we know that floats?"

"Really small stones!"

"More witches!"

I know you were so please do not be defensive for I assure you I am not - That is the trouble with the written word - people who read it may attach or imagine certain emotions behind it when that is not the case at all. That being said -

What you written above I agree with but I believe that is not the case when it comes to this topic - I believe Mr. Marshall has proven his case not only by proving what it is not but by proving what it is. Again, look at the definitions of just what a language/code is. Did you actually read his whole argument? Go to his site and take some time to do so - Watch his video.

[TheAryanPath]

Originally Posted by GordZilla

In science it has to be demonstratable,

Agreed GordZilla, the problem is that MACRO Evolution cannot be duplicated or predicted. As such, MACRO Evolution violates the very basics of the scientific method. Macro Evolution is pseudo-science invented by the Jew sickness.

[berlinsandpit]

This is interesting, in that what qualifies in a court of law is dogma to a free thinking science realm who has the right to explore the back door,,,
Here are some instances using the reverse backdoor approach by reversing the meaning of common scientific claims;
Take the phrase intellegent design and substitute it with "retarded design";take a look at our realm and see how many examples of this you can find,,,even retarded codes which maybe the byproduct afterbirth of intellegent intentions or part of the theory that you cannot legitmately produce the desirable results of one thing completely without creating the equal opposite state ;its possible that our phenomenal realm to produce any logical intellegent product has to compete with the realm of stupidity or stupid design(like an inescapable quirk),,,in this its like the black box theory of whatever you desire to put in to get a desirable product out;you may only get a percentage only of your desired outcome..

Our realm if compared to mathematics of positives and negatives maybe a 50/50 ;this is the perfection of imperfection and a constant flux of overcoming..

The "natural selection process" is as much the "natural rejection process"

The universe although it impresses my ignorance in a form of awe and wonder, may to an even more intellegent being be a realm of grey average equalibrium, that is not really worthy of respect because being alone it has no contemporary comparison...

Monotheism more than any other factor is the realisation that beyond all sub archetypes that there is only one absolute;everything else is a subdivision of it via opposite states eg good and evil etc

---------- Post added at 04:35 pm ---------- Previous post was at 04:21 pm ----------

Consider the unnatural bastardisation process as a deliberate design attempt to damage a superior competitor of its vitality,,by diluting its essence with contaminations,,,;like when the parasite vampire kills its last host and dies because there is only vampires remaining..

Instead of improving mankind there is a designed program at work to inhibit and retard progress...

[TruthIsAntiSemitic]

The reason that we don't have physical evidence of the earliest lifeforms is beacuse they wouldn't be large enough to fossilize.

But anyways, the world is in chaos, so if there is an intelligent designer I sure would like to have a word with him(?).