The Protocols of The Learned Elders of Zion

[McHenry186]

YouTube- The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion explained (1/2)

YouTube- The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion explained (1/2)

EMERGING FROM DEEP SECRECY, portions of the Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion were brought to light in the late 19th Century in France. It is a fascinating story, presented here in a unique, unprecedented and thoroughly documented fashion. Months of intense research has gone into this work.

In 1884, a Mademoiselle Justine Glinka, the daughter of a Russian general, was engaged in Paris in gathering political information for the court of Tzar Alexander III.

Glinka employed a Jewish agent named Joseph Schoerst, alias Shapiro, who had passed himself off as a Freemason and a member of the Mizraim Lodge, a Jewish Masonic order with its own particular rites and protocols. None other than Solomon Rothschild, scion of the Jewish banking dynasty, was a prominent member of the French Freemasons.

Schoerst offered to Glinka for the sum of 2,500 francs, a document which he said would interest her greatly. This document contained extraordinary dictated writings from assorted speeches which would later be included in the final compilation of the Protocols of Zion. [click "continue" for part 2 of video]

Continue reading →

[NoLongerSilentUSA]

Read The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion here:

Forbidden Truth - View Single Post - The Protocols of The Learned Elders of Zion


And see the video here:

Forbidden Truth - The Basics - The Protocols of The Learned Elders of Zion

[mickiandalusia]

The best proof of the "Protocols" is the reality of our days.
Reading it is a MUST. Here we see how thoroughy the jews scheduled their way
to their JEWISH UTOPIA.

[Prussea]

"Not only we Jews are a degenerate, dried out, used up culture. All of the races in Europe are as well. Perhaps we have infected them? Ruined their blood? Judified everything? Our thinking is in everything living, our spirit rules the world. We are the lords, for what has power today is our spiritual child. One may hate us, persecute us. Our enemies may triumph over our physical weakness. We can no longer be gotten rid of. We have conquered the races, defiled them, broken their power, made everything rotten, foul, and decayed with our stale culture. Our spirit is no longer to be exterminated."
~ Kurt Münzer in his novel "The Way to Zion" published in 1910

[TheAryanPath]

Offer $100 to your friends, family and co-workers if they can find just (1) instance of anything anti-Jew in The Protocols. The Protocols are 100% anti-Gentile in totality. The $100 offer may get someone you know to read The Protocols in the hopes of proving you wrong; just be sure to have a copy handy when you make the offer.

The Protocols can be viewed similar to Mein Kampf. Would anyone say Mein Kampf was anti-German? Nope. Just as no one can say The Protocols are anti-Jew.

[9693eel]

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

polskawalczaca.com]polskawalczaca.com • Zobacz w?tek - THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION • Zobacz w?tek - THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION

[9693eel]

Originally Posted by 9693eel

Not even 1/2 a day goes by and some jew flags my upload,
video removed, no notice this time, video just removed

[9693eel]

The word "freedom" brings out the communities of men to fight against every kind of force, against every kind of authority even against God and the laws of nature. For this reason we, when we come into our kingdom, shall have to erase this word from the lexicon of life as implying a principle of brute force which turns mobs into bloodthirsty beasts.

[Jack Napier]

So ridiculed was this book, that for years, I never felt fussed to read it.

Then I bought a copy.

I cannot say who specifically wrote it, but whoever it specifically was, either that was a rough PLAN for the following century, or it is a stunning and remarkable coincidence that the World looks....precisely as outlined in it.

[LaydeeLiberty]

"THINKING IS the hardest work there is, which is probably the reason why so few engage in it."

- Henry Ford Sr., Inventor, industrialist, humanitarian, often credited with establishing the middle class in America,

Ford published a book called the THE INTERNATIONAL JEW, The World's Problem something he thought EVERY "thinking" person should read. http://theforbiddentruth.net/downloa...do=file&id=202

IN an interview published in the New York World February 17, 1921, Mr. Henry Ford put the case for the "Protocols of Zion" tersely and convincingly. He said:

"The only statement I care to make about the Protocols is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. They fit it now."

HERE IS something else to "think" about. Pull out a copy of Orwell's 1984. Dust it off.

News speak is defined as: "A language designed to diminish the range of thought"


Eustace Mullins, was an American historical researcher and the last living protégé of Ezra Pound, Mullins was the first American to expose the Federal Reserve fractional Banking system at the bequest of Ezra Pound. Both he and Ezra Pound believed the protocols to be authentic.

With regard to the protocols of Zion, Mullins would say in my day, the Jews always screamed "forgery" whenever they came to light. When asked about The Protocols, Mullins would chuckle and reply, well what exactly is a Forgery?

He liked to remind everyone that a forgery is nothing but an UNauthorized, public copy of the original.

KEEP IN MIND the word here is UNauthorized NOT authorized.

If someone has authority to make a copy, it is NEVER called a forgery.


Orwell's 1984 was also about the corruption of language.
SO LET'S CRITICALLY THINK ABOUT THE MEANING OF THE WORD HERE.

Most people today assume whenever something is a forgery it is fake, NOT real so they discount it without further thought.

And YET, if you understand what is being said whenever someone actually "forges" a signature, painting, or work of art. . .

The signature or work of art is as close to an exact copy of "the original" as possible, but the person who made it public or used it in public, DID NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY to do so, and only then does it become, a forgery.

Those who published the Protocols DID NOT have the permission from the original owners to make this document PUBLIC and so the Jewish community naturally used to scream Forgery.

Ezra Pound in his radio speeches during WWII from Italy on April 20, 1943 talking about Zion Protocols. READ these speeches and you will know why the put Ezra Pound in prison.

http://theforbiddentruth.net/downloa...do=file&id=236

Ezra Pound in his radio speeches WWII

#78 (April 20, 1943) U.S.(C35)
ZION

If or when one mentions the Protocols alleged to be of the Elders of Zion, one is frequently met with the
reply: Oh, but they are a forgery.

Certainly they are a forgery, and that is the one proof we have of their authenticity.

The Jews have worked with forged documents for the past 24 hundred years, namely ever since they have had any documents whatsoever. And no one can qualify as a historian of this half century without having examinedthe Protocols. Alleged, if you like, to have been translated from the Russian, from a manuscript to be consulted in the British Museum, where some such document may or may not exist. What we know for certain is that they were published two decades ago. That Lord Sydenham wrote apreface to them. That their content has been traced to another sketch said to have appeared in the eighteen
forties.

The interest in them does not lie in [the] question of their having been, or NOT been concocted by a legislative assembly of Rabbis, democratically elected, or secretly chosen by the Mysterious Order of
Seven Branched Antlers or the Bowling Society of Milwaukee. Their interest lies in the type of mind, or the state of mind of their author.

That was their interest for the psychologist the day they first appeared.
And for the historian two decades later, when the program contained in them has so crushingly gone into effect up to a point, or down to a squalor. What is interesting, perhaps most, to the historian is their definite campaign against history altogether,their declared intention to blot out the classics, to blot out the record, and to dazzle men with talk oftomorrow. That is a variant on the pie in the bait. As far as reality is concerned, as far as you and I are concerned it makes little difference whether prosperity is in heaven, or in the year 2300, or just round a
corner that will never be turned.

A religious man might think his reward might be in heaven, but even a religious man ought to knowthat his reward will not be on earth in a hundred years time. In fact, the pie in the sky is a more reasonable
proposition: an opium with more to it than Mr. Keynes’ day after tomorrow.

I am not concerned with fixing blame retrospectively so much as with judging the present: those whoare against the true word, the protocolaires. Now Keynes whose fair is foul, foul is fair sentence can be
taken as the quintessence of something or other, is the perfect protoclaire. It comes over me that on the one occasion I had the curious experience of seeing him, he managed to utter two falsehoods in a very short space of time. In fact never opened his mouth without doing so. First in stating that he is an orthodox economist, which he is not, second in saying that the then high cost of living was due to lack of labor,when there were millions of men out of work.

You couldn’t have done much better in two sentences if you were out for a record in the falsification. Protocol No. 8, second [paragraph]:
We shall surround our government with a whole world of economists. That is the reason why economic sciences form, etc. Around us again will be a whole constellation of bankers, industrialists,capitalists and the main thing, millionaires, because in substance everything will be settled by the question of figures.

Is it possible to arouse any interest in verbal precision? Is it possible to persuade more than six or eight people to consider the scope of crossword puzzles and other devices for looking at words for something
that is NOT their meaning? Cabala, for example, anything to make the word mean something it does NOT say.

Anything to distract the auditor from the plain sense of the word, or the sentence? Even to communism that is NOT communism. To communism of the episcopal sort, which they want in England. A Bolshevism
that is to leave the archibishops and curates just where they are, each with his living or benefice. A revelation against capital, allegedly against capital, that attacks property and leaves capital setting pretty.
Lenin all out for making banking a state affair. And then twenty years during which it has seemed to drop decidedly into the background, when the world revolution was very busy about something else.

It should by now be clear that some people fear NOT the outcome of the war, but the END of the war. Churchill, for example. Not defeat, not the ruin of the Empire that worries him, but the END of the war.
End of the slaughter, end of the war conditions.

Robert Clive has been clear enough, ex-British ambassador in Tokyo. Tells you and the world Japan can not be beaten. But the war must go ON, according to Churchill and Roosevelt. Churchill sees the end
of monopoly and privilege, or at least a shift when the war ends, no matter HOW. That is the point you should consider. In regard to the protocols, either there is and was a plot to ruin all goyim, all nations of
Europe, or some people are stark raving crazy. They want war to go on to certain wreck. WHO are they?

Mere cannon fodder. The American troops in N. Africa know they are not there thru any wish of their own. The war was started for gold, to maintain the fetish value of gold. Plenty of other sidelines. Minor
advantages have been COMMERCIALLY taken. Did the present regime in England WANT the troops to return after Dunkirk? Every move for reform in England is a fascist reform, or proposition along fascist
lines.

The supreme betrayal of Europe is inherent in the alliance of Anglo-Jewry with Moscow. Debts rise. That is one part of the war. It is a contest between STOPPING the war and going on with it. And only one
side does any fighting. Namely the party that STARTED the war. They are for its continuance. Who are they?

BUT they are also for starting the next one. They openly proclaim that AFTER (that is IF) America finishes with Japan, she will have to fight Russia. IF Russia should break into Europe.

Only blindness and deafness can keep you unaware of these proclamations. The U.S. must protect the world? Why? Does the world want it? The U.S., once this war is over, must be strong enough to beat
Russia.

The U.S. had a chance to maintain her prestige and unique position by staying NEUTRAL. Neutral while other powers exhausted themselves. And she DID not.

Who are the lunatics? Was there a deliberate plot? That is what should concern you. WAS there a plot? How long had it been in existence? Does it continue, with its Lehmans, Morgenthaus, Baruchs?
Proposals to send the darkies to Africa, to work for Judea, and the rest of it? And WILL you, after Japan is thru with you, take on Russia? In order to maintain the banking monopoly? With Mr. Wille Wiseman, late
of the British secret service, ensconced in Kuhn, Loeb and Co., to direct you and rule you? Ezra Pound , April 20, 1943

Douglas Reed, the British journalist and foreign war correspondent for the London Times during the 1930’s and 40’s, in his monumental classic study of Zionism written in 1956 and titled, THE CONTROVERSY OF ZION, has provided the world with an abundance of evidence showing how this conspiracy on the part of the Zionist Jews, clearly delineated in the Protocols, is beyond dispute in terms of its actual existence and that the Protocols (which he agrees cannot be verified as to source) are living proof that the program contained within the document had unfolded precisely as planned up to the time of the completion of his book in 1956 and that if the world didn’t quickly realize what the Zionists were doing that the next half century would most likely conclude the deadly designs contained within the document.
Douglas Reed Source:
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/topha...s11may11.shtml

DownLOAD the Protocols
http://theforbiddentruth.net/downloa...do=file&id=144