Unfortunately, most of us are not willing to even BEGIN the fight. Only a small minority of us who are aware are willing to put it all on the line.
We desperately need to inspire a greater degree of commitment from ALL Whites and White activists. There is so much to be done and so few who are willing to do what is necessary.
BTW - John de Nugent is the one who brought religion into the discussion. NOT ME!
But I certainly called him out on it when he proclaimed that EVERYONE in "his" country would have to have some form of religion. He believes that this is the only way a man will act in a righteous manner. They must feel that the "Cosmic Eye" is watching them or else he feels they are not to be trusted.
Well, yeah.. I will correct ANYONE who makes such bold and ridiculous statements such as that. Here we have a "White Nationalist" putting HIS faith above RACE! So why not just call himself a preacher and stick to the gospel? That would make more sense to me and it would be perfectly understandable. But to turn away RIGHTEOUS men who simply DO NOT need to share HIS beliefs in order to "do the right thing", is unnacceptable. NOT UNLESS he identifies himself as a RELIGIOUS man 1st and a White man second. But again, that is NOT his position.
To me, the 1st focus MUST be on the Jews. NONE of us will EVER have our freedom until they are dealt with FIRST! Then, as Whites, Blacks, Christians, Muslims, we can each decide our own fate. Live our lives as free men. So for him to come along and exclude MANY of "his" own people, because HE "believes" they "MUST HAVE faith" is not a good strategy, to say the least. As I pointed out to him.
You are not 'indifferent', you only believe yourself to be. If you were, there'd be no reply from you at all.
What can I say, I am a polite person. When people take the time to write to me, I try to write them back. Regardless of the issue. But there is absolutely no (extra) emotion attached to this subject and it really is no more or no less important than the countless other topics i discuss.
Quote:
You do have a bias on the topic, as do I, like it or not. "Faith= complacency" , need I say more???
Yeah.. No kidding. But I don't want to get "STUCK on" this one topic. "Stuck on god", need I say more? No! Because I already said it all!
Quote:
I 'press' the issue, or as you put; bring you 'down' because you are a strong voice in the movement,
Well then, here's what YOU should do. YOU should make YOUR voice a "strong" one as well. That is the BEST way to get YOUR position across to others.
IF I come across someone whom I do not agree with, I simply present my own points and leave it to the viewers/listeners to decide for themselves. Simple enough.
Quote:
who's looking to exact change for the better. Yet you're dismissing, and frankly out of hand, a VERY important piece, that being; our best weapon. - which has been proven successful repeatedly against the Jew and it's also been -virtually- our only weapon (as far us uniting against the Jew). I've illustrated this a few times for you now
there are TWO sides to that. and we are on opposite ends of it.
I believe that Christianity has been the Jews GREATEST WEAPON against us (for CENTURIES).
You somehow claim, despite admitting that it is now tainted, that it is "our best weapon".... Which is laughable (To ME)
are MOST Christians Jew-Wise? NO! MOST Christians are blind supporters of the Jews that CONTROL them. So to even suggest that Christianity is (generally) a threat to them is absurd. Yet that is your position.
IF it was so "successful", then why are we still facing the SAME problem? And more importantly, if it is a "threat" to the Jew, then why are MOST Christians blindly defending their Jewish oppressors? To the 1st question, you would answer: "we are facing the problem because people have lost their faith". But from where I am standing all that this (more Christians) would lead to is a larger army of mindless SLAVES worshiping the "Chosen People".
You have admitted that Christianity is tainted. So it is therefor no longer a "threat" to the Jews (IF it ever was), it is actually a TOOL that they use against us (mostly Whites).
NOW...You can spend your time more wisely, like on a Christian site, and clean up the MESS that even you have admitted Christianity to now be... that would be the wise thing to do. THEN come back to me AFTER you sort your own "house" and tell me what a threat Christianity posses them. Because right NOW, Christianity, as a whole, is anything BUT a threat to them.
again (going in circles),
Why try and convince me that Christianity posses a threat to them or that it EVER did? YOU should be spending your time educating your fellow Christians and cleaning up the big Jewish mess that MOST of your "brothers and sisters" now believe. That way your otherwise EMPTY words ("Christianity is a threat", etc) can finally have some meaning in the REAL world! To hell with the hypotheticals and your OPINION on the past, let's see the Christians of TODAY start talking about FREEING themselves from their Jewish oppressors, rather than seeing so many of them SUPPORTING them.
Again, you are talking to the wrong person my friend. You should spend your time on some Christian sites educating them so that perhaps they could one day be this "threat" that YOU have "visioned" them as being.
Good luck with that.
Quote:
Side note; I always find it odd whenever I engage in debate about religion with (and i mean in general, not now) a secular person that it can only be me that's seen as passionate about the topic. When to any unbiased observer the conversation's passion is always matched on both sides. This belief secular people have that they are indifferent is never reflected in their opinions, nor their passion for expressing those opinions (just like mine, or anyone's). No one is ever found to be both indifferent and opinionated - the two don't mix, it's really that simple.
lol Try me. Put me to the test. If RELIGIOUS people stopped bringing THEIR faith into EVERY conversation, you would not hear me talk about it ever again.
Do you talk about Santa Claus all the time? NO! Because you (probably) do not believe in him. So therefor it is of NO importance to you. Well, same applies to me here. I am no more attached on an emotional level to "god" or Christianity, than anyone over the age of 10 would be attached to Santa.
BUT.. I will point out the manner in which Christianity HAS IN FACT been used to control the "Goyim", in the same manner as all the other agencies, organizations, and institutions have been used to control them. One really being NO more important to ME than the other.
Quote:
I only reply in the hope you may recognised the strength faith can also bring,
SO FAR that is an unrealized "potential". Nothing real in this "strength" other than the manner in which it has strongly worked to control the stupid "Goyim" who fall for it. Once that "threat" is realized, come back and talk to me. Until then, it is much more of a weakness than a strength.
Quote:
as I do believe unity is our only chance.
Unity between whom? Whites? Christians? All Gentiles?
And I guess the only way you believe we can truly "unify" is through the word of a Christian "god"? Nothing else will cut it huh? It's Christianity or bust! lol
Quote:
I don't necessarily mean unity under God, but rather unity between people of all colours and religions who are sick of the Jew's .
Awesome! I am with you all the way on that one! NO DOUBT! We can ALL unify, DESPITE our differences and stand against this common enemy. Christians, Muslims, Whitey, Blackey, etc..
So let us now agree to disagree and continue on with our unified efforts against the Jewish bastards who have sinned against us ALL!
You are not 'indifferent', you only believe yourself to be. If you were, there'd be no reply from you at all.
You do have a bias on the topic, as do I, like it or not. "Faith= complacency" , need I say more??? I 'press' the issue, or as you put; bring you 'down' because you are a strong voice in the movement, who's looking to exact change for the better. Yet you're dismissing, and frankly out of hand, a VERY important piece, that being; our best weapon. - which has been proven successful repeatedly against the Jew and it's also been -virtually- our only weapon (as far us uniting against the Jew). I've illustrated this a few times for you now, and I'll probably continue to.
The Jews hate Jesus above anyone else for good reason( from their perspective). Look back in history, take my previous challenge, it becomes obvious why they need to first remove the Christian moral code instilled in Whites (and others) thru Jesus Christ (and Mohammad) before they can simply destroy the Whites. The first part to their agenda is long done, pretty much entirely, in and around 50 years ago. You know, right when you saw the morality these great nations USED to have fall by the wayside. Also about the time you started seeing immigration go thru the roof, gay marriage becoming popular, abortion being generally accepted, prayers removed from schools etc etc.
It's not to convert you Scott, it's to wake you. You don't have to believe in God to see the reality of this on the ground. They removed that code for virtually all of us, NOW they plan to remove us. As the old 'Christian' resistance they USED to face is now far gone - It's been replaced by a welcoming 'Judeo-Christianity'.
To me that is a very important issue in this fight. They hate Jesus, why? (they don't like Mohammad much either, but their real hate is for Jesus, above ALL else)
Side note; I always find it odd whenever I engage in debate about religion with (and i mean in general, not now) a secular person that it can only be me that's seen as passionate about the topic. When to any unbiased observer the conversation's passion is always matched on both sides. This belief secular people have that they are indifferent is never reflected in their opinions, nor their passion for expressing those opinions (just like mine, or anyone's). No one is ever found to be both indifferent and opinionated - the two don't mix, it's really that simple.
Second Side note; Scott, I don't want to convert you, I know I said that already, I just don't want you to think my replies are anything vindictive or mean spirited or carry that agenda ( talking about faith and God is always dangerous territory if you do not want to start an all out war - religious pun on war intended :-) I only reply in the hope you may recognised the strength faith can also bring, as I do believe unity is our only chance. I don't necessarily mean unity under God, but rather unity between people of all colours and religions who are sick of the Jew's . I.e. Unity rather than exclusion. So with that said I'll return the 'cheers' if I can find the icon.
I'm a good man, you're a good man, and that's all that REALLY matters. How you got there is not my concern. And you should feel the same way about me. Simple enough.
You're both good men and, regardless of your motives, are doing the right thing. You're comrads in arms with nothing different other than religious beliefs.
but even MORE accurate would be to say " being White in and of itself does not qualify someone as being moral, or righteous. "
Did I ever say that it does? (nope, sure didn't)
Quote:
So it could be easily argued that someone who is spiritual is more likely to be moral and righteous (and especially when it comes to the Jewish question) than someone who is just White alone.
You could "argue" anything you like, but your "arguing" it alone does not make it so.
Quote:
I've already been down the road...
Yes, and it is a dead end street. So why do you insist on continually dragging me down it with you?
YOU have "faith", good for you. Really, it's a wonderful thing to have. I am not envious, but I don't fault you for it either. I truly am indifferent, since you do not allow that faith to blind you. On the other hand, I do not have it and probably never will. But I am not blinded by my lack of it. We are at the same point (aware), so no need to worry too much about how we arrived here.
When I bring up Christians, I am referring to the ones who are blinded by it. but that applies to EVERYTHING and EVERYONE else as well. I don't JUST focus on Christianity. Some of you just take it personally when I do speak on the manner in which it has also been tainted.
Want to go on in circles forever and claim that those who "fought" Jews or those who live a righteous life do so because they are religious, then that's fine. But in the end I really don't care what their reasons are, what they need to believe in, or how they came to realize the truth....so long as they SEE it and so long as they are willing to DO something about it. I'm a good man, you're a good man, and that's all that REALLY matters. How you got there is not my concern. And you should feel the same way about me. Simple enough.
Originally Posted by McHenry186;
"Lining it up with the Pope is not saying that much since he is a NWO tool himself along with most of the hierarchy of the "Church." "
Quoting Scott;
"That was my point. lol That being religious or spiritual in and of itself does not qualify someone as being brave, moral, or righteous. "
In all due fairness though Scott, 2 things;
1. McHenry is talking about the organised Church, and on that he is dead on right. I think we all agree on this.
2. "Being religious or spiritual in and of itself does not qualify someone as being brave moral or righteous" You are right, but even MORE accurate would be to say " being White in and of itself does not qualify someone as being moral, or righteous. " ( I'll give you 'brave') For Morality and righteousness however, skin colour will give you absolutely NOTHING. So it could be easily argued that someone who is spiritual is more likely to be moral and righteous (and especially when it comes to the Jewish question) than someone who is just White alone. I've already been down the road of what is 'culture', what defines 'morality' and' righteousness', perhaps now maybe we should explore the lists of White people who have ever spoke up against or supplied resistance to the Jew. Just how many were also religious, or at least faithful? While doing that, you'll notice another odd trend, the further back in time you go, the higher those numbers will grow. Now do the same for White secular people in History - A reverse trend would emerge; starting with way smaller numbers and shrinking to nearly none.
Scott: I totally agree. It takes a real man to realize and admit the errors of his past. GLR is the perfect of example of this. I believe Rockwell's autobiography "This Time The World" to be a highly motivational and inspirational work, even if our current situation is much different (MUCH WORSE) than during Rockwell's era.
Another great example is General Patton who was so eager to defeat the "Krauts" yet later realized (when it was too late) the United States had fought for the WRONG SIDE.
Great Patton quotes before his mysterious death:
He described in his diary one DP camp,
"where, although room existed, the Jews were crowded together to an appalling extent, and in practically every room there was a pile of garbage in one corner which was also used as a latrine. The Jews were only forced to desist from their nastiness and clean up the mess by the threat of the butt ends of rifles. Of course, I know the expression 'lost tribes of Israel' applied to the tribes which disappeared -- not to the tribe of Judah from which the current sons of bitches are descended. However, it is my personal opinion that this too is a lost tribe -- lost to all decency."
Patton's initial impressions of the Jews were not improved when he attended a Jewish religious service at Eisenhower's insistence. His diary entry for September 17, 1945, reads in part:
"This happened to be the feast of Yom Kippur, so they were all collected in a large, wooden building, which they called a synagogue. It behooved General Eisenhower to make a speech to them. We entered the synagogue, which was packed with the greatest stinking bunch of humanity I have ever seen. When we got about halfway up, the head rabbi, who was dressed in a fur hat similar to that worn by Henry VIII of England and in a surplice heavily embroidered and very filthy, came down and met the General . . . The smell was so terrible that I almost fainted and actually about three hours later lost my lunch as the result of remembering it."
Another September diary entry, following a demand from Washington that more German housing be turned over to Jews, summed up his feelings:
"Evidently the virus started by Morgenthau and Baruch of a Semitic revenge against all Germans is still working. Harrison (a U.S. State Department official) and his associates indicate that they feel German civilians should be removed from houses for the purpose of housing Displaced Persons. There are two errors in this assumption. First, when we remove an individual German we punish an individual German, while the punishment is -- not intended for the individual but for the race.
Furthermore, it is against my Anglo-Saxon conscience to remove a person from a house, which is a punishment, without due process of law. In the second place, Harrison and his ilk believe that the Displaced Person is a human being, which he is not, and this applies particularly to the Jews, who are lower than animals."
On August 31 he wrote: "Actually, the Germans are the only decent people left in Europe. it's a choice between them and the Russians. I prefer the Germans." And on September 2: "What we are doing is to destroy the only semi-modern state in Europe, so that Russia can swallow the whole."
By this time the Morgenthauists and media monopolists had decided that Patton was incorrigible and must be discredited. So they began a non-stop hounding of him in the press, a la Watergate, accusing him of being "soft on Nazis" and continually recalling an incident in which he had slapped a shirker two years previously, during the Sicily campaign. A New York newspaper printed the completely false claim that when Patton had slapped the soldier who was Jewish, he had called him a "yellow-bellied Jew."
Only FT Partners, Moderators and Administrators can upload relevant video to our server. If you feel you can make a difference with your videos please PM Scott to inquire about our Partner Status.
Originally Posted by 9693eel
Unfortunately, most of us are not willing to even BEGIN the fight. Only a small minority of us who are aware are willing to put it all on the line.
We desperately need to inspire a greater degree of commitment from ALL Whites and White activists. There is so much to be done and so few who are willing to do what is necessary.
BTW - John de Nugent is the one who brought religion into the discussion. NOT ME!
But I certainly called him out on it when he proclaimed that EVERYONE in "his" country would have to have some form of religion. He believes that this is the only way a man will act in a righteous manner. They must feel that the "Cosmic Eye" is watching them or else he feels they are not to be trusted.
Well, yeah.. I will correct ANYONE who makes such bold and ridiculous statements such as that. Here we have a "White Nationalist" putting HIS faith above RACE! So why not just call himself a preacher and stick to the gospel? That would make more sense to me and it would be perfectly understandable. But to turn away RIGHTEOUS men who simply DO NOT need to share HIS beliefs in order to "do the right thing", is unnacceptable. NOT UNLESS he identifies himself as a RELIGIOUS man 1st and a White man second. But again, that is NOT his position.
To me, the 1st focus MUST be on the Jews. NONE of us will EVER have our freedom until they are dealt with FIRST! Then, as Whites, Blacks, Christians, Muslims, we can each decide our own fate. Live our lives as free men. So for him to come along and exclude MANY of "his" own people, because HE "believes" they "MUST HAVE faith" is not a good strategy, to say the least. As I pointed out to him.
Originally Posted by GordZilla
You do have a bias on the topic, as do I, like it or not. "Faith= complacency" , need I say more???
I 'press' the issue, or as you put; bring you 'down' because you are a strong voice in the movement,
IF I come across someone whom I do not agree with, I simply present my own points and leave it to the viewers/listeners to decide for themselves. Simple enough.
who's looking to exact change for the better. Yet you're dismissing, and frankly out of hand, a VERY important piece, that being; our best weapon. - which has been proven successful repeatedly against the Jew and it's also been -virtually- our only weapon (as far us uniting against the Jew). I've illustrated this a few times for you now
I believe that Christianity has been the Jews GREATEST WEAPON against us (for CENTURIES).
You somehow claim, despite admitting that it is now tainted, that it is "our best weapon".... Which is laughable (To ME)
are MOST Christians Jew-Wise? NO! MOST Christians are blind supporters of the Jews that CONTROL them. So to even suggest that Christianity is (generally) a threat to them is absurd. Yet that is your position.
IF it was so "successful", then why are we still facing the SAME problem? And more importantly, if it is a "threat" to the Jew, then why are MOST Christians blindly defending their Jewish oppressors? To the 1st question, you would answer: "we are facing the problem because people have lost their faith". But from where I am standing all that this (more Christians) would lead to is a larger army of mindless SLAVES worshiping the "Chosen People".
You have admitted that Christianity is tainted. So it is therefor no longer a "threat" to the Jews (IF it ever was), it is actually a TOOL that they use against us (mostly Whites).
NOW...You can spend your time more wisely, like on a Christian site, and clean up the MESS that even you have admitted Christianity to now be... that would be the wise thing to do. THEN come back to me AFTER you sort your own "house" and tell me what a threat Christianity posses them. Because right NOW, Christianity, as a whole, is anything BUT a threat to them.
again (going in circles),
Why try and convince me that Christianity posses a threat to them or that it EVER did? YOU should be spending your time educating your fellow Christians and cleaning up the big Jewish mess that MOST of your "brothers and sisters" now believe. That way your otherwise EMPTY words ("Christianity is a threat", etc) can finally have some meaning in the REAL world! To hell with the hypotheticals and your OPINION on the past, let's see the Christians of TODAY start talking about FREEING themselves from their Jewish oppressors, rather than seeing so many of them SUPPORTING them.
Again, you are talking to the wrong person my friend. You should spend your time on some Christian sites educating them so that perhaps they could one day be this "threat" that YOU have "visioned" them as being.
Good luck with that.
Side note; I always find it odd whenever I engage in debate about religion with (and i mean in general, not now) a secular person that it can only be me that's seen as passionate about the topic. When to any unbiased observer the conversation's passion is always matched on both sides. This belief secular people have that they are indifferent is never reflected in their opinions, nor their passion for expressing those opinions (just like mine, or anyone's). No one is ever found to be both indifferent and opinionated - the two don't mix, it's really that simple.
lol Try me. Put me to the test. If RELIGIOUS people stopped bringing THEIR faith into EVERY conversation, you would not hear me talk about it ever again.
Do you talk about Santa Claus all the time? NO! Because you (probably) do not believe in him. So therefor it is of NO importance to you. Well, same applies to me here. I am no more attached on an emotional level to "god" or Christianity, than anyone over the age of 10 would be attached to Santa.
BUT.. I will point out the manner in which Christianity HAS IN FACT been used to control the "Goyim", in the same manner as all the other agencies, organizations, and institutions have been used to control them. One really being NO more important to ME than the other.
I only reply in the hope you may recognised the strength faith can also bring,
SO FAR that is an unrealized "potential". Nothing real in this "strength" other than the manner in which it has strongly worked to control the stupid "Goyim" who fall for it. Once that "threat" is realized, come back and talk to me. Until then, it is much more of a weakness than a strength.
as I do believe unity is our only chance.
And I guess the only way you believe we can truly "unify" is through the word of a Christian "god"? Nothing else will cut it huh? It's Christianity or bust! lol
I don't necessarily mean unity under God, but rather unity between people of all colours and religions who are sick of the Jew's
So let us now agree to disagree and continue on with our unified efforts against the Jewish bastards who have sinned against us ALL!
Cheers!!!
You are not 'indifferent', you only believe yourself to be. If you were, there'd be no reply from you at all.
You do have a bias on the topic, as do I, like it or not. "Faith= complacency" , need I say more??? I 'press' the issue, or as you put; bring you 'down' because you are a strong voice in the movement, who's looking to exact change for the better. Yet you're dismissing, and frankly out of hand, a VERY important piece, that being; our best weapon. - which has been proven successful repeatedly against the Jew and it's also been -virtually- our only weapon (as far us uniting against the Jew). I've illustrated this a few times for you now, and I'll probably continue to.
The Jews hate Jesus above anyone else for good reason( from their perspective). Look back in history, take my previous challenge, it becomes obvious why they need to first remove the Christian moral code instilled in Whites (and others) thru Jesus Christ (and Mohammad) before they can simply destroy the Whites. The first part to their agenda is long done, pretty much entirely, in and around 50 years ago. You know, right when you saw the morality these great nations USED to have fall by the wayside. Also about the time you started seeing immigration go thru the roof, gay marriage becoming popular, abortion being generally accepted, prayers removed from schools etc etc.
It's not to convert you Scott, it's to wake you. You don't have to believe in God to see the reality of this on the ground. They removed that code for virtually all of us, NOW they plan to remove us. As the old 'Christian' resistance they USED to face is now far gone - It's been replaced by a welcoming 'Judeo-Christianity'.
To me that is a very important issue in this fight. They hate Jesus, why? (they don't like Mohammad much either, but their real hate is for Jesus, above ALL else)
Side note; I always find it odd whenever I engage in debate about religion with (and i mean in general, not now) a secular person that it can only be me that's seen as passionate about the topic. When to any unbiased observer the conversation's passion is always matched on both sides. This belief secular people have that they are indifferent is never reflected in their opinions, nor their passion for expressing those opinions (just like mine, or anyone's). No one is ever found to be both indifferent and opinionated - the two don't mix, it's really that simple.
Second Side note; Scott, I don't want to convert you, I know I said that already, I just don't want you to think my replies are anything vindictive or mean spirited or carry that agenda ( talking about faith and God is always dangerous territory if you do not want to start an all out war - religious pun on war intended :-) I only reply in the hope you may recognised the strength faith can also bring, as I do believe unity is our only chance. I don't necessarily mean unity under God, but rather unity between people of all colours and religions who are sick of the Jew's
Ah good it's right there;
Originally Posted by scott
I'm a good man, you're a good man, and that's all that REALLY matters. How you got there is not my concern. And you should feel the same way about me. Simple enough.
Originally Posted by GordZilla
So it could be easily argued that someone who is spiritual is more likely to be moral and righteous (and especially when it comes to the Jewish question) than someone who is just White alone.
I've already been down the road...
----------------------------------------------------------
YOU have "faith", good for you. Really, it's a wonderful thing to have. I am not envious, but I don't fault you for it either. I truly am indifferent, since you do not allow that faith to blind you. On the other hand, I do not have it and probably never will. But I am not blinded by my lack of it. We are at the same point (aware), so no need to worry too much about how we arrived here.
When I bring up Christians, I am referring to the ones who are blinded by it. but that applies to EVERYTHING and EVERYONE else as well. I don't JUST focus on Christianity. Some of you just take it personally when I do speak on the manner in which it has also been tainted.
Want to go on in circles forever and claim that those who "fought" Jews or those who live a righteous life do so because they are religious, then that's fine. But in the end I really don't care what their reasons are, what they need to believe in, or how they came to realize the truth....so long as they SEE it and so long as they are willing to DO something about it. I'm a good man, you're a good man, and that's all that REALLY matters. How you got there is not my concern. And you should feel the same way about me. Simple enough.
Originally Posted by McHenry186;
"Lining it up with the Pope is not saying that much since he is a NWO tool himself along with most of the hierarchy of the "Church." "
Quoting Scott;
"That was my point. lol That being religious or spiritual in and of itself does not qualify someone as being brave, moral, or righteous. "
In all due fairness though Scott, 2 things;
1. McHenry is talking about the organised Church, and on that he is dead on right. I think we all agree on this.
2. "Being religious or spiritual in and of itself does not qualify someone as being brave moral or righteous" You are right, but even MORE accurate would be to say " being White in and of itself does not qualify someone as being moral, or righteous. " ( I'll give you 'brave') For Morality and righteousness however, skin colour will give you absolutely NOTHING. So it could be easily argued that someone who is spiritual is more likely to be moral and righteous (and especially when it comes to the Jewish question) than someone who is just White alone. I've already been down the road of what is 'culture', what defines 'morality' and' righteousness', perhaps now maybe we should explore the lists of White people who have ever spoke up against or supplied resistance to the Jew. Just how many were also religious, or at least faithful? While doing that, you'll notice another odd trend, the further back in time you go, the higher those numbers will grow. Now do the same for White secular people in History - A reverse trend would emerge; starting with way smaller numbers and shrinking to nearly none.
Scott: I totally agree. It takes a real man to realize and admit the errors of his past. GLR is the perfect of example of this. I believe Rockwell's autobiography "This Time The World" to be a highly motivational and inspirational work, even if our current situation is much different (MUCH WORSE) than during Rockwell's era.
Another great example is General Patton who was so eager to defeat the "Krauts" yet later realized (when it was too late) the United States had fought for the WRONG SIDE.
Great Patton quotes before his mysterious death:
He described in his diary one DP camp,
"where, although room existed, the Jews were crowded together to an appalling extent, and in practically every room there was a pile of garbage in one corner which was also used as a latrine. The Jews were only forced to desist from their nastiness and clean up the mess by the threat of the butt ends of rifles. Of course, I know the expression 'lost tribes of Israel' applied to the tribes which disappeared -- not to the tribe of Judah from which the current sons of bitches are descended. However, it is my personal opinion that this too is a lost tribe -- lost to all decency."
Patton's initial impressions of the Jews were not improved when he attended a Jewish religious service at Eisenhower's insistence. His diary entry for September 17, 1945, reads in part:
"This happened to be the feast of Yom Kippur, so they were all collected in a large, wooden building, which they called a synagogue. It behooved General Eisenhower to make a speech to them. We entered the synagogue, which was packed with the greatest stinking bunch of humanity I have ever seen. When we got about halfway up, the head rabbi, who was dressed in a fur hat similar to that worn by Henry VIII of England and in a surplice heavily embroidered and very filthy, came down and met the General . . . The smell was so terrible that I almost fainted and actually about three hours later lost my lunch as the result of remembering it."
Another September diary entry, following a demand from Washington that more German housing be turned over to Jews, summed up his feelings:
"Evidently the virus started by Morgenthau and Baruch of a Semitic revenge against all Germans is still working. Harrison (a U.S. State Department official) and his associates indicate that they feel German civilians should be removed from houses for the purpose of housing Displaced Persons. There are two errors in this assumption. First, when we remove an individual German we punish an individual German, while the punishment is -- not intended for the individual but for the race.
Furthermore, it is against my Anglo-Saxon conscience to remove a person from a house, which is a punishment, without due process of law. In the second place, Harrison and his ilk believe that the Displaced Person is a human being, which he is not, and this applies particularly to the Jews, who are lower than animals."
On August 31 he wrote: "Actually, the Germans are the only decent people left in Europe. it's a choice between them and the Russians. I prefer the Germans." And on September 2: "What we are doing is to destroy the only semi-modern state in Europe, so that Russia can swallow the whole."
By this time the Morgenthauists and media monopolists had decided that Patton was incorrigible and must be discredited. So they began a non-stop hounding of him in the press, a la Watergate, accusing him of being "soft on Nazis" and continually recalling an incident in which he had slapped a shirker two years previously, during the Sicily campaign. A New York newspaper printed the completely false claim that when Patton had slapped the soldier who was Jewish, he had called him a "yellow-bellied Jew."
Originally Posted by NoLongerSilentUSA
This video made me question if this is de Nugent's real voice or an impersonator making Jewish propaganda.